| Primary goal |
Identify environmental risk indicators and guide next steps |
Confirm and quantify impacts through sampling and laboratory analysis |
Address confirmed impacts and work toward risk reduction or closure |
| Typical trigger |
Due diligence, lending, acquisition, refinancing |
Known or suspected concerns requiring data (e.g., petroleum, solvents, metals, etc.) |
Exceedances, recognized impacts, regulatory or owner-driven cleanup needs |
| Level of investigation |
Non-intrusive evaluation and records-based review |
Intrusive field investigation (subsurface sampling) |
Active response (removal, treatment, controls) and/or regulatory coordination |
| Fieldwork |
Generally none |
Borings/test pits, soil sampling, groundwater sampling, possible monitoring wells, vapor sampling as appropriate |
Confirmation sampling, delineation, remedial installation oversight, O&M monitoring |
| Laboratory testing |
Typically none |
Analytical testing for targeted constituents based on site history and objectives |
Additional/confirmatory testing to document progress and support decisions |
| What you “get” |
Risk picture and a practical path forward |
Measured results, mapped findings, and clear conclusions |
Action plan and documentation supporting stabilization, risk management, or closure |
| Decision outcome |
Proceed, negotiate, or investigate further |
Proceed with confidence, refine risk/cost, or define the response scope |
Implement remedy, manage risk, pursue closure, support redevelopment |
| Best fit for |
Lenders, buyers, developers, attorneys needing screening-level due diligence |
Teams needing defensible data for decisions, negotiations, design, or compliance |
Owners/developers needing practical solutions and project continuity |
Leave A Comment